My logo
Join the CPSU
Home
News
Events
Campaigns
Issues
  • FAQs
  • Support for members on 1300 137 636
  • CPSU submissions
  • Making agreements
  • Enforcing agreements
  • Contracts and AWAs
  • Health, safety and compensation
  • Harassment and bullying
  • Behaviour and misconduct
  • Superannuation
  • Equity at work
  • Work and family
  • In the public interest
Agency / industry
  • Arts, sport and tourism
  • Borders
  • Centrelink
  • Communications
  • Health and welfare
  • Justice and the courts
  • Parliament, policy and regulation
  • Science, education and research
  • Tax and revenue
  • Territories
Benefits & services
  • Who can join CPSU and how much does it cost?
  • Discount movie tickets
  • Discount shopping
  • Discount magazines
  • Insurance
  • Financial services
  • Travel deals
  • Legal services
  • Computers and internet
  • OHS training
  • CPSU merchandise
  • Careers
Library
About us
  • CPSU election 2008
  • CPSU... it works for me
  • What is the CPSU?
  • CPSU values and policy
  • Leadership team
  • CPSU rules and annual report
  • Employment opportunities
  • Media contacts
  • ISU information
Directory
Regions
  • Australian Capital Territory
  • New South Wales
  • Northern Territory
  • Queensland
  • South Australia
  • Tasmania
  • Victoria
  • Western Australia
Delegates area
  • Be a part of something that matters
  • CPSU Delegates Manual
  • Union resources
  • Arts, sport and tourism
  • Borders
  • Centrelink
  • Communications
  • Health and welfare
  • Justice and the courts
  • Parliament, policy and regulation
  • Science, education and research
  • Tax and revenue
  • Territories
Search

Search tips ...
CPSU Blog Update your details
Subscribe to CPSU news
View Newsletters
Get back issues

RSS Newsfeeds
RSS Get news via RSS
About RSS
Home
Mail this page Email a friend  Print this page. Printer friendly version

Tough Budget test

CPSU National Secretary, Stephen Jones. CPSU National Secretary, Stephen Jones.

The 13 May Budget was the toughest in a decade. But what does it mean for public sector workers, asks CPSU National Secretary, Stephen Jones.

The 13 May Budget was the toughest in a decade and was seen by many as the first real test of the Rudd Government's economic credentials.

With inflation and interest rates on the move and continuing global instability, there is growing pressure from commentators and business groups for large scale cuts to government spending and public services.

At the same time we are looking to the Rudd Government to use its first Budget to deliver the compassion and decency the Australian community voted for at the election.

We know the Government's 'razor gang' will be imposing a one-off 2% extra efficiency dividend on top of the 1.25% dividend already in place. These cuts were announced pre-election and are already locked in.

But this has not stopped us taking up the case for a new approach to PS finance.

In our view, blunt arbitrary measures such as the 2% extra dividend do nothing to improve public sector productivity and damage the capacity of public service agencies to deliver services effectively.

Arbitrary cuts inevitably lead to 'false economies' which cost taxpayers more in the long run.

Put simply, if you cut staff in frontline offices you will effect the quality and timeliness of the service clients receive.

Is it really a saving to reduce the quantity, quality and scope of ABS surveys that are used by businesses and Governments to plan future developments? A reduction in ATO staffing undermines efforts to minimize tax avoidance and maximize revenue collection.

Our ability to respond to the challenges of climate change will not be enhanced by cutting programs in CSIRO or the Bureau of Meteorology.

At a time when the public service is struggling to attract and retain experienced and talented employees, short term measures won't help.

Several months ago the CPSU leadership identified a number of key objectives to protect members' interests.

Top of the list was the need to avoid involuntary redundancies and ensure there was an effective whole-of-government redeployment process.

The good news is that following intensive lobbying from the CPSU, the Government agreed to establish the Career Transition and Support Centre (CTSC), a specialist support unit to manage and coordinate redeployment for APS staff affected by funding cuts.

When Labor Senator John Faulkner launched the CTSC at CPSU Governing Council in March he said: “We want to ensure that excess staff are provided with the opportunity to remain in the APS... and that the requirement for the compulsory retrenchment of staff is minimised. The Rudd Government is determined that the public service retains corporate knowledge, expertise and skilled workers and our approach will ensure the retention and reallocation of staff with skills essential for implementing the government’s new policy agenda.”

The real job now is to keep the Government to its word and ensure departments use the redeployment process to avoid compulsory redundancies.

In meeting the many challenges the Budget presents, the CPSU leadership team also identified the need ensure the 'one-off' extra dividend does not become a standard feature of future budgets, and that workloads are adjusted when staffing levels change.

The CPSU has prepared materials and information to support individuals who may be affected by Budget changes. As a union member you will be able to access information and advice about your rights and entitlements under your agreement. (See Redeployment and redundancy FAQ)

Over the next few month the CPSU will be working hard to ensure the rights of individuals are respected through out any change process. We will continue to argue against arbitrary cuts and in favor of a public sector that can deliver quality services and quality jobs.

Thanks for your ongoing membership and support. Please feel free to post a comment below and visit our campaign site.

More information: Visit our Public Service Pressure campaign page here.

Comments (8)
 
Posted by:    IB - 29 Sep 2008, 2:24pm

Re reading the DEEWR Bargaining Update "Are you on the A team or B team?" and the comment that DEEWR management have provideded little informaiton ont he vision for a solution on pay. The pay rates are a real mess, caused by the huge difference in AWA rates and exacerbated by the differences betweeen DEST, DEWR and FaHCSIA. One solution. Wherever possible, translate the individual to the level where their payment sits. I would assume that the payment reflects the knowledge and skills of the individual. If not then managment has some explaining to do.

Posted by:    FP - 1 Jun 2008, 9:56pm

I am a public servant in Queensland and all union members should understand that when Harry Potter headed up the then Premier Goss's Premiers dept, the Goss govt ammedned the WorkCover Act in QLD to exclude, sorry, reduce strss claims the then Labor Govt hacked into the public service to make us ger used to working harder.

They ammendments are generally knows as the Goss ammendments. The architect was guess who, yes Harry Potter. The Ammendment is knows as the Reasonalbe Management Action rule.

The chances of a successful WorkCover claim for a stress claim is now extremely slim. So you could end up with a PPI injury but its not an injury under the Act.

All I can say is "get used to working harder" and there is a fair chance you will suffer a PPI injury as your work loads will increase while your productivity will deminish.

Sorry I forgot, didn't Labor promised to looks after us hard working public servants. But then again wasn't Vince Gair once a Labor man.

I just hope the union movement is not mislead into believing Harry Potter will look after us workers. I suppose when your spouse is worth millions, you would have complete empathy with the working class of Australia. The other perplexing issue is that I thought the government was there for the people and not the people there for the govt.

Just maybe I'm a little cynical.

Posted by:    JOHN SEOTIS - 22 May 2008, 9:11am

THE CHOICE OF WORK IN A CALL CENTRE WITH NO FLEX TIME/STANDARD HOURS BEING IMPRISONED AT YOUR DESK FOR UP TO 4 HOURS IS VERY STRESSFULL AND DOWN RIGHT UNHEALTHY(DEEP VEIN THROMBOSIS)AND DESTROYS THE BALANCE BETWEEN WORK AND FAMILY COMMITMENTS DESPITE ALL THE LIP SERVICE AND PLATITUDES FROM NATIONAL MANAGERS THE SECRETARY THE MINISTER AND THE GOVERNMENT WHO IS ULTIMATELY RESPONSIBLE FOR THIS STATE OF AFFAIRS

Posted by:    Fin - 14 May 2008, 8:34am

The elephant in the room has got to be the inequity introduced by AWAs, which widened the gap between salaries of APS workers and 'bosses'. CPSU should have been lobbying the Government to apply the efficiency dividend selectively to reducing the cost of senior executive service salaries. It shouldn't have to be about arbitrary job losses.

Posted by:    AM - 2 May 2008, 4:56pm

I can't understand why anybody who actually 'works' in the APS would want to stay. Bullying, harrassment, unreasonable case loads, micromanagement, no career and promotion opportunities, corrupt selection processes - the list goes on

 
 Home       About RSS       Privacy       Links       Disclaimer       Feedback       Contacts       Sitemap
© 2007 Community and Public Sector Union
URL: http://www.cpsu.org.au/blog/7001.html
CPSU